3 ms·
Maybe I don’t understand your sense of humour but it sure seems like you’re laughing at victims of a crime. That’s not funny.
by hluska 1y ago
Maybe I don’t understand your sense of humour but it sure seems like you’re laughing at victims of a crime. That’s not funny.
- southernplaces7 1y agoSure it is, sometimes at least, depending on who and how dumb the victims were.
- HenryBemis 1y agoI am obviously not happy that this happens/happened to people and they had to cough up large amounts of $$$ because they got hacked. If anything I'm in the profession Audit/Sec/GRC and VERY much against thieves. The 'amusing' part is... since the first time I encountered "DevOps" I thought that it is a terrible idea (but what do I know...). There are some stupid buzzwords that became the norm and I thought they were moronic/creepy/dangerous form the fist time I heard them (and I was spot on). DevOps is one. It's like saying "someone eats swords for a living" and "that very someone pierced his stomach". I will feel sorry for the fella and will wish him speedy recovery, but I will whisper to myself "what a f... moron". Also, due to my Audit/Sec/GRC background, I laugh when I read/hear such stories because "you auditors know shit, we don't need ITGCs" and plenty other stupid shit that I hear from Tech Bros. Well, how do you like them apples/ITGCs now??? So, don't try to bark at the one who laughs. Instead punch the moron who says "we don't need ITGCs, documentation, reviews, etc, they are a waste of time". So.. sorry, not sorry (at all). EDIT: as you can understand this is a sensitive topic for me, because ITGCs cause time/money, but hey, go ask those DevOps, (now) would they prefer to have ITGCs are X cost in time, or they prefer the loss? And seeing that they have BAD IT practices who will ever trust them again to do something right?