> I find it easy to admit that computer art did not contribute to the advancement of art. (We = humans) We made the tweets. We made the paintings. We wrote stu

> I find it easy to admit that computer art did not contribute to the advancement of art. (We = humans) We made the tweets. We made the paintings. We wrote stupid things on Reddit (or the smarter things). We photographed nature. We built LLMs. In a way, what LLMs are doing is derivative/product of 'our' (and nature's) work. It's like adding 4 ingredients to the blender, blend it for only a few seconds, and you get variation. If you put 4 similar ingredients and you blend again for the exactly same amount of seconds you will get something similar but not the same. LLM is a blender :)