3 ms·
I don't think the author actually bothered to read the patent. It's explicitly mentioned that the user receives the media stream e.g. radio or internet audio a
by taligent 14y ago
I don't think the author actually bothered to read the patent.
It's explicitly mentioned that the user receives the media stream e.g. radio or internet audio and then switches to a local media stream. The company he listed, Absolute Radio is doing the sending not receiving. So the patent doesn't even apply.
That said why on earth would Apple be at all interested in suing radio stations. It's completely and utterly illogical given how much they rely on content providers.
- gtCameron 14y agoThe author isn't saying that Apple could kill commercial radio by suing the radio stations for violating this patent, the argument is that no one will ever listen to commercials again therefore killing the stations revenue stream.