Lets analyze this: 1. Paragraph: intro and an citation 2. paragraph: 2 wrong things, Airdrop is proprietary, the opensource programs are reverse engineered an

Lets analyze this: 1. Paragraph: intro and an citation 2. paragraph: 2 wrong things, Airdrop is proprietary, the opensource programs are reverse engineered and the EU gave Apple two options that they can do within the timeframe they gave: open it for others to use and implement or to replace it with an existing public solution. 3. paragraph: Mostly the authors opinion 4. Paragraph: captures what the EU intends to do. Apple could allow an service to read notifications or send the notifications themself to an device by making the protocol public. 5. Paragraph: Another Opinion. Nothing to judge at. last paragraph: The Allegory is in my opinion wrong: not all doors need to be open. To stay in the Hotel: The customer checks in but he needs to use an unreliable keycard instead of his phone for opening the door, because only Apple devices can open the door to the room. With an Appledevice the room is already at the temperature, the light is at an prefered color and the staff knows at which time you want to be waked up. with any other phone you have to manually adjust the temperature, the lightcolor is an uncomfortable white that can't be changed and you have to inform the staff by going down about the wakeup time.