3 ms·
One good reason is that a huge population of companies just don't have enough data to justify Snowflake. We sell a product built on it, and I wish we'd had Duck
by skeeter2020 1y ago
One good reason is that a huge population of companies just don't have enough data to justify Snowflake. We sell a product built on it, and I wish we'd had DuckDB 3-4 years ago; it's perfect for 95%+ of our clients
- 9283409232 1y agoI think DuckDB is great but I don't think it is necessarily playing the same game as Snowflake. A lot of people want the serverless option and DuckDB is not that.
- mrbungie 1y agoDuckDB on a lambda/serverless python function wrapper or in WASM (for client-side workloads) is as stateless and serverless as you can get. In that case BigQuery is more managed than both, PAYG for analytical queries without thinking about compute nor clusters whatsoever.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 9283409232 1y agoBigQuery is more expensive than Snowflake though. You might as well just do Motherduck which would be cheaper than BQ but let you pull data from S3 which is cheaper than Snowflake storage.