4 ms·
If this was the case, regular code review as a practice would be entirely unworkable.
by thegeomaster 1y ago
If this was the case, regular code review as a practice would be entirely unworkable.
- seadan83 1y agoInteresting point! I'd like to explore this a bit more. Would you mind going into a bit more specifics/details on why regular code review practice would become unworkable, like which specific part(s) of it?
- Mofpofjis 1y ago"regular" code review is indeed a total theater, a travesty, a farce. Real, meticulous code review takes absolutely forever.
- JacobThreeThree 1y agoThis speaks to the low quality assurance bar that most of the software industry lives by. If you're programming for a plane's avionics, as an example, the quality assurance bar is much, much higher. To the point where any time-saving benefits of using an LLM are most likely dwarfed by the time it takes to review and test the code. It's easy to say LLM is a game-changer when there are no lives at stake, and therefore the cost of any errors is extremely low, and little to no QA occurs prior to being pushed to production.
- recursive 1y agoHuh? Why? How? Say the code takes one day to write, and two days to review. What about that is unworkable?