The article is a bit lengthy, which makes it hard to distill any message. Perhaps the vagueness is on purpose, since it ends with the classic "But what about Ch

The article is a bit lengthy, which makes it hard to distill any message. Perhaps the vagueness is on purpose, since it ends with the classic "But what about China?" FOMO. Clearly "AI" is plagiarism. There are YouTube voice translations now that are trained on the original speaker's voice. How is this not a derivative work? If you train an AI on 1,000,000 voices so it can pretend to "create" an average voice, that voice is still the derivative work of all input voices. The EU making "AI" scraping opt-out is disgraceful. It should be opt-in. Vance and Trump (mentioned in the piece) are irrelevant. Watch Vance in his latest meeting with von der Leyen and Meloni, where Vance suddenly was very friendly when von der Leyen mentioned a total trade volume of $1 trillion. Von der Leyen also called Meloni (who was previously designated as a "fascist") by her first name. They all were best friends forever.