3 ms·

Your detonator part is not quite enough working, the common sense is 2 interpassing aluminum wire. JPEG machine learning is totally not working when you can fl

Your detonator part is not quite enough working, the common sense is 2 interpassing aluminum wire. JPEG machine learning is totally not working when you can fly a whole day long in museum so of course the drones attacking A50 (and a few of less valuable targets) used to have some powerful computer able to decipher the video from a fisheye camera. Working in a peacetime military does not really help to answer my question, working as killer drone programmer certainly does. And there were no laymen in the operation we are discussing.

runjake 1y ago
> Your detonator part is not quite enough working, the common sense is 2 interpassing aluminum wire. You are right and this is a better idea. > JPEG machine learning is totally not working when you can fly a whole day long in museum so of course the drones attacking A50 (and a few of less valuable targets) used to have some powerful computer able to decipher the video from a fisheye camera. I don't know what you mean when you say "museum". This doesn't not make sense in English. Can you rephrase? I disagree and think computer vision would be a good option for the Ukrainian scenario. For why I shy away from NN using off-the-shelf parts, see my previous comment which I've updated. tl;dr: You need decent compute/GPU to analyze sample frames at the speeds these drones fly. Off the shelf TPU modules suck for this application, lat/longitude array for splitting work, etc. If Ukraine is putting decent APUs on these drones, my apologies. > Working in a peacetime military does not really help to answer my question, working as killer drone programmer certainly does. I did not work in a peacetime military :). And the information I gave here doesn't really reflect how it's done in the military. > And there were no laymen in the operation we are discussing. Again, I was just answering OP's question from a layman perspective. If you were doing it with military programmers and military technologies, there are better technologies to use.
- eimrine 1y ago
  > If you were doing it with military programmers and military technologies, there are better technologies to use. Sorry but this is BS. > I don't know what you mean when you say "museum". This doesn't not make sense in English. Can you rephrase? A lot of old airplanes on an outdoor field, anybody can visit it for cheap and see the greatest aerial vehicles of USSR.
  - runjake 1y ago
    > Sorry but this is BS. I guess we'll have to disagree on this topic. > A lot of old airplanes on an outdoor field, anybody can visit it for cheap and see the greatest aerial vehicles of USSR. From this and other stuff you've been saying in this thread, I get the sense you don't have a lot of practical experience in this area. You're being pretty rude in this thread. What have you done and worked on? Anything? It does not sound like it.
    - eimrine 1y ago
      Let's agree to disagree. You have never seen a drone warfare, I have never worked on anything useful for a drone warfare.

runjake 1y ago

> Your detonator part is not quite enough working, the common sense is 2 interpassing aluminum wire. You are right and this is a better idea. > JPEG machine learning is totally not working when you can fly a whole day long in museum so of course the drones attacking A50 (and a few of less valuable targets) used to have some powerful computer able to decipher the video from a fisheye camera. I don't know what you mean when you say "museum". This doesn't not make sense in English. Can you rephrase? I disagree and think computer vision would be a good option for the Ukrainian scenario. For why I shy away from NN using off-the-shelf parts, see my previous comment which I've updated. tl;dr: You need decent compute/GPU to analyze sample frames at the speeds these drones fly. Off the shelf TPU modules suck for this application, lat/longitude array for splitting work, etc. If Ukraine is putting decent APUs on these drones, my apologies. > Working in a peacetime military does not really help to answer my question, working as killer drone programmer certainly does. I did not work in a peacetime military :). And the information I gave here doesn't really reflect how it's done in the military. > And there were no laymen in the operation we are discussing. Again, I was just answering OP's question from a layman perspective. If you were doing it with military programmers and military technologies, there are better technologies to use.

eimrine 1y ago
> If you were doing it with military programmers and military technologies, there are better technologies to use. Sorry but this is BS. > I don't know what you mean when you say "museum". This doesn't not make sense in English. Can you rephrase? A lot of old airplanes on an outdoor field, anybody can visit it for cheap and see the greatest aerial vehicles of USSR.
- runjake 1y ago
  > Sorry but this is BS. I guess we'll have to disagree on this topic. > A lot of old airplanes on an outdoor field, anybody can visit it for cheap and see the greatest aerial vehicles of USSR. From this and other stuff you've been saying in this thread, I get the sense you don't have a lot of practical experience in this area. You're being pretty rude in this thread. What have you done and worked on? Anything? It does not sound like it.
  - eimrine 1y ago
    Let's agree to disagree. You have never seen a drone warfare, I have never worked on anything useful for a drone warfare.