> I think the article is better without the pearl clutching of how could our righteous and holy OpenAI promote such sinful language— Where did you get the impr

> I think the article is better without the pearl clutching of how could our righteous and holy OpenAI promote such sinful language— Where did you get the impression the author of this post viewed OpenAI as anything like that? I thought she came across as skeptical and/or unapproving of them. > like yeah this is a hilarious blunder for them but the incel world itself the far more interesting part. Even the author spends more time talking about incels after presumably falling down the inevitable research rabbit hole than the fact it is the #6 lifestyle AI or whatever She clearly found it interesting too--why this "Even the author" bit? Are you upset that she mis-titled her post in your opinion? I think it's worth noting that this bot is currently as popular as it is, and that OpenAI is fraturing it as such.