What compatiblism is saying would be ok in an academic context if they define a new term like consistency instead of hijack free will to mean something else ent

What compatiblism is saying would be ok in an academic context if they define a new term like consistency instead of hijack free will to mean something else entirely. But even then, consistency of behavior in a deterministic world would not lead to the possibility of moral responsibility unless you also hijack that term and give it a different meaning.