2 ms·
> A stream of its chemical byproduct is given off, and in the case of aircraft this would be emitted out the back, not unlike the exhaust from a jet engine. >
by yetihehe 1y ago
> A stream of its chemical byproduct is given off, and in the case of aircraft this would be emitted out the back, not unlike the exhaust from a jet engine.
> But there’s a very big difference: There would be no carbon dioxide emissions. Instead, the emissions, consisting of sodium oxide, would actually soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This compound would quickly combine with moisture in the air to make sodium hydroxide — a material commonly used as a drain cleaner — which readily combines with carbon dioxide to form a solid material, sodium carbonate, which in turn forms sodium bicarbonate, otherwise known as baking soda.
Remember acid rain? Now we will have alkaline rain. Using fuel for planes, that makes exhaust that dissolves the planes might not be a smart idea.
- pjc50 1y agoIt doesn't dissolve the plane. It's mildly toxic to ground crew, though.
- yetihehe 1y agoIt dissolves all other planes and things made from aluminum. The plane using this would need to collect exhaust and spread it when up in air and distant enough from airfield, so that it has enough time to react with atmosphere.