4 ms·
I think, the argument would make more sense if software like Cubase came with unlicenced samples from all songs out of the box. Artists sued and won when someon
by k__ 1y ago
I think, the argument would make more sense if software like Cubase came with unlicenced samples from all songs out of the box. Artists sued and won when someone used their samples without permission.
If you use AI to create art, it's like that.
- CuriouslyC 1y agoThere's a difference between a sample and something inspired by something but also significantly different. The copyright laws around music are kind of draconian so it's not a good analogy for code anyhow, imagine a world where a fundamental do while loop had 90 year copyright protection, and that's the sort of world we'd be living in if code copyright was like music copyright.
- k__ 1y agoIf you see the generated content as "the music that's created with unlicenced samples" that's true. However, if you see the trained models as "the music that's created with unlicenced samples" it isn't true.