2 ms·
I see. But your point is then orthogonal. So it's $400/h not $100/h per SWE as you need experienced good people anyway. But the question really is: what soluti
by bravesoul2 1y ago
I see. But your point is then orthogonal. So it's $400/h not $100/h per SWE as you need experienced good people anyway.
But the question really is: what solution minimises tbe number of those hours? Formal or informal?
- simiones 1y agoIf I can build something in 100 hours paying 100$/hour, or 33 hours paying 400$/hour, I may well choose the 100 hours version. Which is why we hire interns in the first place, rather than only hiring senior architects for our companies.
- AnimalMuppet 1y agoWhere do you work that you're paying interns 100$/hr and seniors 400$/hr, and are you hiring?