3 ms·
I have to agree; the designs of the remotes are atrocious. The designers should have prioritized the “can’t see the remote at 4AM” problem over the dozens of fe
by andyferris 1y ago
I have to agree; the designs of the remotes are atrocious. The designers should have prioritized the “can’t see the remote at 4AM” problem over the dozens of features I’ll never use.
- bravesoul2 1y agoI suspect it is not features, but the cost of designing a good UX remote is much greater than using a tv-like remote that some manufacturer has set up tooling for and you just need to change the label.
- jacknews 1y agoBut the original designer/manufacturer could have invested some time in a decent UI. Perhaps we should have govt 'UI standards' in the same way we have other efficiency standards. Or even a voluntary 'UI council quality rating' or something, to encourage good design from the start.