4 ms·
AWACS is if anything more vital and more vulnerable than bombers. If you're blind it doesn't matter how much firepower you've got.
by lmm 1y ago
AWACS is if anything more vital and more vulnerable than bombers. If you're blind it doesn't matter how much firepower you've got.
- slt2021 1y agoloss of awacs can be compensated with satellite and drones. its no big deal. but if all aerial refueling fleet is damaged, like KC-135 Stratotankers then it will be over very quickly. or blowing up Navy's ice cream supply depots and it will be over as well
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> loss of awacs can be compensated with satellite and drones. its no big deal One can compensate for the loss of AWACS with satellites and low-flying drones in the way one can compensate for a sprained ankle with crutches. See the recent Pakistan-India skirmish, which Pakistan appears to have won on account of sensor fusion powered by its AWACS.
- slt2021 1y agoNo, Pakistan won because Indian generals are absolutely incompetent. They sent the planes for suicide mission without suppressing enemy air defense. Indians planes flew too close to the border without suppressing AD. Pakistani planes flew from highland valley which was invisible from radio perspective