3 ms·
Nope. The Amiga did just fine 8 hours a day, even 16 hours a day, coding and word processing and everything else. Interlace wasn't a huge issue, and the price d
by leptons 1y ago
Nope. The Amiga did just fine 8 hours a day, even 16 hours a day, coding and word processing and everything else. Interlace wasn't a huge issue, and the price difference between Macintosh and Amiga made it easy to justify. A simple "flicker fixer" could be added for far less than the difference in price between an Amiga and a Mac. The Mac cost $1000 more than an Amiga, which is a lot to pay to get a far less capable platform. A "flicker fixer" went for $100.
Apple in the 90's was cirlcing the drain, nobody wanted an overpriced black-and-white computer except die-hard apple fans, and Apple only exists today because Microsoft bailed them out. Too bad Microsoft didn't invest in Amiga instead.
- orionblastar 1y agoNot to mention, with emulators like A-Maxx, the Amiga could run Mac software: https://amiga.resource.cx/exp/amax https://amiga.resource.cx/exp/amax There were even C64, Apple II, IBM PC-DOS, and Atari ST emulators for the Amiga.
- krige 1y agoAs the saying went, the best Mac you could get was an Amiga with Shapeshifter running.