3 ms·
Not from a legislative perspective, no. Those are extremely privileged methods of resource collection, and typically the companies who cause damage do not pay f
by const_cast 1y ago
Not from a legislative perspective, no. Those are extremely privileged methods of resource collection, and typically the companies who cause damage do not pay for the cleanup. We just call it a superfund site and then spend taxpayer dollars for the next 50 years trying to get it to a slightly less poisonous state.
- pydry 1y agoThat's not "we" that's the same legislative "them" that lavish taxpayer subsidies on nuclear power plants and shift 99.5% of the nuclear accident cleanup liability on to the taxpayer. They're just as keen on nuclear power for military reasons as they are keen on supporting carbon industries because of money and lobbyists.