3 ms·
I'm a teacher at DBC and that's not our attitude at all, for what it's worth. :) As we get better-and-better at optimizing those ten weeks, we'll add more adva
by jfarmer 14y ago
I'm a teacher at DBC and that's not our attitude at all, for what it's worth. :)
As we get better-and-better at optimizing those ten weeks, we'll add more advanced topics. I'd love to have a set of challenges like that later in the 10 weeks.
In fact, one group wrote their own custom query language to query github repositories (e.g., a language to say things like "Give me a list of all github repositories whose primary language is Ruby with more than 1 contributor and 10 outstanding TODOs") as part of their final 9-day project. They might not have had the vocabulary for it, but they were essentially wrestling with problems in compiler design.
The more salient part of his sentence is the last half: he didn't care. At DBC we spend tons of energy on creating situations where the only way to solve a (fun, hopefully) problem is to learn compilers, algorithms, databases, etc.
- wonnage 14y agoDefinitely! From what I've heard (I was at the graduation on Friday), there's a level of investigation at DBC that goes beyond anything I've seen in other programs like Codeacademy. Which makes sense, I guess, given the much greater time investment and cost. The thing that strikes me is how negatively a four-year program is seen. It's a matter of pride for some that 1. they got their jobs with a relatively minimal time investment 2. they learned "practical" concepts rather than the "useless" CS theory college grads get.