3 ms·

> there's no other way. There is the other way, and you're observing it yourself. Underestimating Ukraine is the regular trope of the west for all of Ukraine'

by hkpack 1y ago

> there's no other way. There is the other way, and you're observing it yourself. Underestimating Ukraine is the regular trope of the west for all of Ukraine's independence. Ukrainians in mil-tech who interact with NATO regularly mention that the alliance is significantly behind on the modern warfare tech and the gap increases every day.

maeil 1y ago
Satellites and intel are the obvious one where they'd get help, surely? Basically everything else, from strategy to execution, it makes sense that they're ahead as you're suggesting.
paganel 1y ago
When it comes to drones, yes, UA is way ahead of the Westerners, I’ve hinted to that in the recent comments I still leave on this website (you can check both my comment and submission history). But this wouldn’t have been possible without top-notch reconnaissance and especially communication, I’m pretty sure that right now Ukraine doesn’t have the tech capability to stream almost instant video-feeds from its drones attacking in Irkutsk. Just look at any map, you need satellite communications for that (or somehow UA infiltrating RU’s network and using it at will, undetected).
- hkpack 1y ago
  I don't know whether you've noticed, but both countries perform robotic drone operation (on land, air and on the water) well above the abilities of direct radio communication in a highly radio jammed space for some time now. The tech and the infrastructure required for that is non trivial and is being built and evolves every day. Most likely, for this specific case the civilian infrastructure was used for relaying traffic. This is one of the reason why Russia shuts down internet in the areas of deep aerial drone strikes. Keep in mind that according to the reports this operation was planned for more than a year and was not something done without deep planning.
- fifilura 1y ago
  I suppose Russia also has mobile network? I have seen some comments speculating that the trucks relayed 5G signals to the drones.
- thecompilr 1y ago
  The used regular drones and the streaming was done over regular cellular networks
- dralley 1y ago
  >When it comes to drones, yes, UA is way ahead of the Westerners This happens to have been a drone operation. >But this wouldn’t have been possible without top-notch reconnaissance and especially communication Ukrainian intelligence has been focused near-exclusively on Russia for more than a decade, and they likely have more human intelligence assets in Russia right now than the US has ever had. >you need satellite communications for that (or somehow UA infiltrating RU’s network and using it at will, undetected). another way of writing that would be "acquiring a couple dozen Russian SIM cards and pairing them with the kind of cellular radios half the planet has in their pocket right now". No aspects of this operation require any particularly advanced technology or intelligence.

by hkpack 1y ago

maeil 1y ago

Satellites and intel are the obvious one where they'd get help, surely? Basically everything else, from strategy to execution, it makes sense that they're ahead as you're suggesting.

paganel 1y ago

When it comes to drones, yes, UA is way ahead of the Westerners, I’ve hinted to that in the recent comments I still leave on this website (you can check both my comment and submission history). But this wouldn’t have been possible without top-notch reconnaissance and especially communication, I’m pretty sure that right now Ukraine doesn’t have the tech capability to stream almost instant video-feeds from its drones attacking in Irkutsk. Just look at any map, you need satellite communications for that (or somehow UA infiltrating RU’s network and using it at will, undetected).

hkpack 1y ago
I don't know whether you've noticed, but both countries perform robotic drone operation (on land, air and on the water) well above the abilities of direct radio communication in a highly radio jammed space for some time now. The tech and the infrastructure required for that is non trivial and is being built and evolves every day. Most likely, for this specific case the civilian infrastructure was used for relaying traffic. This is one of the reason why Russia shuts down internet in the areas of deep aerial drone strikes. Keep in mind that according to the reports this operation was planned for more than a year and was not something done without deep planning.
fifilura 1y ago
I suppose Russia also has mobile network? I have seen some comments speculating that the trucks relayed 5G signals to the drones.
thecompilr 1y ago
The used regular drones and the streaming was done over regular cellular networks
dralley 1y ago
>When it comes to drones, yes, UA is way ahead of the Westerners This happens to have been a drone operation. >But this wouldn’t have been possible without top-notch reconnaissance and especially communication Ukrainian intelligence has been focused near-exclusively on Russia for more than a decade, and they likely have more human intelligence assets in Russia right now than the US has ever had. >you need satellite communications for that (or somehow UA infiltrating RU’s network and using it at will, undetected). another way of writing that would be "acquiring a couple dozen Russian SIM cards and pairing them with the kind of cellular radios half the planet has in their pocket right now". No aspects of this operation require any particularly advanced technology or intelligence.