4 ms·
In the case that it’s a human posting sarcastically, wouldn’t that be a false positive?
by rsfern 1y ago
In the case that it’s a human posting sarcastically, wouldn’t that be a false positive?
- Smaug123 1y agoDepends what you're trying to identify. If you're trying to identify "machine-generated", yes. If you're trying to identify "spam", probably not? Spam posted sarcastically is no more something I'd want in my comments section than spam posted by a bot.
- johnea 1y agoSo, you don't think humans should express sarcasm? Sounds more like censorship than moderation to me...
- dwaltrip 1y agoJust saying "it's sarcasm" doesn't tell you much. It depends on the kind of sarcasm as well as the content. You can moderate comments on your own blog however you'd like.
- johnea 1y ago> You can moderate comments on your own blog however you'd like. Thank you so much for that permission. (this is an example of sarcasm, it's used as a form of criticism to express disagreement by saying the exact opposite of what is actually meant. Currently, this could serve as a test for human text, because the LLM slop that I read is typically asskissingly obsequious, whereas humans are often not that friendly to each other)
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]