3 ms·
Everyone seem like to be discussing the show and none the article. For someone who hadn’t watched the show, the article is a pain to read. The images are throw
by tecoholic 1y ago
Everyone seem like to be discussing the show and none the article.
For someone who hadn’t watched the show, the article is a pain to read. The images are thrown in randomly, there is no relationship between the text and the images. Every images is pointlessly labelled “Cinematography of “Andor” by Christophe Nuyens”. The interview seems to have covered things in detail, like going into specific scenes and sets, and lens.. etc., but the accompanying images are utterly useless in showing any of that to the reader.
I gave up after a while.
- acomjean 1y agoTo be fair, the photos were just ones provided by Disney. Most likely promotional shots. They used them as examples of the work, and as stills they hold up. I thought the article cromulent.
- lucideer 1y agoI didn't find the images relevant to the article - they seemed to just be filler to avoid it seeming like a mundane wall of text - but I just ignored them & didn't find it hard to read as a result? I can understand it might be difficult to understand the context of some set descriptions without having seen the show but I think that would also be true with relevant still images as you'd still lack character & narrative context. Honestly can't see how they could've formatted the article any better than they did. Seems fine.
- themadturk 1y agoFrankly, the best photo was Denise Gough grinning at the cinematographer. I love seeing actors in costume and out of character, and her playing of Dedra is so chilling, it's like whiplash seeing her being a real human in costume.