I recognize some GPTisms in this article. "Holistic Thinking" and "Ethical Considerations" being things humans are necessary for... it likes to say that a lot.

I recognize some GPTisms in this article. "Holistic Thinking" and "Ethical Considerations" being things humans are necessary for... it likes to say that a lot. I don't agree much, it seems superficial LLM limitation chanting. What I consider things AI can't do without humans - responsibility and accountability, because we have bodies, we can be punished - the very specific life experience we have which is essential for grounding AI, like imagine your experience on the job after a few years - expressing our preferences, nobody can do that for us, we are supposed to ask and evaluate the outcome ourselves - walking, touching, and accessing the world physically; we can implement and test ideas for real, and validate AI work concretely; AI without validation is just an ungrounded idea generator - provide the opportunities for AI to generate value; we bring the problems, we collect the outcomes of AI work; AI can't create value on its own So accountability, tacit experience, telos, validation, opportunities for value creation.