You are misunderstanding the proposed frame: implementations may be faulty, but the approach remains necessary for "LLMs as informers". I.e., the answer provide

You are misunderstanding the proposed frame: implementations may be faulty, but the approach remains necessary for "LLMs as informers". I.e., the answer provider should only work vis-a-vis documentation founding the output. This implies that if we do not have good enough ways to retrieve information from repositories, we will have to invent them. Because the "LLM as informer" can only be allowed to formulate what it will find through the memex. It is possible that to that aim, LLMs can not be directly implemented as they are in the current general state. Also the problem of information reliability has to be tackled, in order to build such system (e.g. some sources rank higher). It is not a solved problem, but it is a clear one. In mission critical applications, you would not even allow asking John at the nearby desk for information he may confuse.