2 ms·
It shouldn’t have used both L and I though, and probably also have dropped O, in favor of adding X and Y.
by layer8 1y ago
It shouldn’t have used both L and I though, and probably also have dropped O, in favor of adding X and Y.
- 131hn 1y agoUsing continious letters for addititives values is a good idea (F+3) can be predicted easily. Yet i agree that confusing « symbols » should be avoided. Forcing UPPERCASE formeront plus using a prefix (Z might be a good one) ZA:03 ZB:23 ZL:55 ZI:12 ZO:08 would work greatly for me
- Kwpolska 1y agoZ can look like 2 in sloppy handwriting.