4 ms·
I'll hopefully get to test it soon. To me, LLMs have so far been great for proofreading and getting suggestions for alternative - perhaps more fluent - phrasing
by karencarits 1y ago
I'll hopefully get to test it soon. To me, LLMs have so far been great for proofreading and getting suggestions for alternative - perhaps more fluent - phrasings. One thing that immediately struck me, though: having 'company' in the URL makes me think corporate and made me much more skeptical than a more generic name would.
- rjakob 1y agoHaha fair point, domain name was a 5-second, “what’s available for $6” kind of decision. Definitely not trying to go full corporate just yet
- karencarits 1y agoGreat! Also, checking journal author guidelines is usually very boring and time consuming, so that would be a nice addition! Like, pasting the guidelines in full and getting notified if I am not following some specs
- rjakob 1y agoWe are already looking into that: https://github.com/robertjakob/rigorous/tree/main/Agent2_Outlet_Fit https://github.com/robertjakob/rigorous/tree/main/Agent2_Out... Would be great to see contributions from the community!
- yusina 1y agoIMO that's what this focus on. Language. That's what LLMs excel at. Perhaps branch out to providing localized papers to markets like China or France (hah, sorry). Judging the actual contents may feel like the holy grail but is unlikely to be taken well by the actual academic research community. At least the part that cares about progressing human knowledge instead of performative paper milling.