My point isn’t “there is no perspective from which you can call anyone here a victim”. It is: “If it’s fair for you to use language like ‘victim’, then it’s fai

My point isn’t “there is no perspective from which you can call anyone here a victim”. It is: “If it’s fair for you to use language like ‘victim’, then it’s fair for others to use sarcasm to make their point, and you can’t complain about it being ‘spin.’” Original GPs comment was justifiable if you allow emotive hyperbole. “Spin”. Op disagreed with the point made by GP but addressed the form in which it was made, over the actual content, while themselves using the same style. That’s not fair. Be consistent: are we being hyperbolic or are we being literal? I’m not even taking sides on the actual redis issue. “Trust was breached”? Can’t argue with that: licenses don’t cover trust and implicit agreements. But then say that, don’t say “you’re wrong for spinning things, but also <spin>”.