3 ms·
would those zero people, be the same ones detailing a viable nuclear waste disposal system that cleans up every last bit of nuclear waste sitting around, befor
by metalman 1y ago
would those zero people, be the same ones detailing a viable nuclear waste disposal system that cleans up every last bit of nuclear waste sitting around, before the generation of more gets "splained" away into the future?
and Chernoble is real, a real example that bad stuff happens, forever, when a nuke plant blows up,and applys to any large nuke plant proposed or in existance.....and that is a fact, there are failure modes that will cause meltdowns, we have incontrevertable evidence of mega, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tidal waves, meteoer strikes, and human caused disasters in the forms of war,dam failures, sabotage, and just everyday stupidity.
- energy123 1y agoEvery power source has externalities. Solar and wind have embedded carbon, waste and land use. The mere existence of downsides does not automatically mean it's a bad idea. Fixating and nitpicking on these downsides as if they're highly pertinent to decision making is what's irrational. Nuclear has historically killed nearly zero people, it is as safe as renewables, especially modern designs.
- ViewTrick1002 1y agoIgnoring that the public is on the hook for any damages. Lets make the playing field equal and have all nuclear plants cover their entire accident liability with their own money rather than the tax purse.