3 ms·
I am comfortable making the sweeping generalization that people with obscene wealth are universally evil. It’s based on a very simple principle. Imagine Superm
by Apreche 1y ago
I am comfortable making the sweeping generalization that people with obscene wealth are universally evil. It’s based on a very simple principle.
Imagine Superman. Literal Superman like in the comic books. He sees a person falling from a building. Of course in the comics he will save them. What if he didn’t? What if he just watched them fall? He could save them, but he doesn’t. What then? You only have to look at the other comic books, Spider—Man for the answer. With great power comes great responsibility.
When you are that wealthy, you have the power to change society with a word. You could bribe all the US congress and institute universal health care. You could build homes for all the homeless. None of them have done this.
You might say hey, what about Bill Gates and his helping with Malaria and promise to donate everything? Ok, so that’s Superman who saves some people from falling buildings, but also watches plenty of others fall. He sure is taking his sweet time. If he was sincere he would already be middle class because he would have used his vast power as quickly and effectively as possible. If the other billionaires are diarrhea, he is still poop.
In the entire history of humanity not one obscenely wealthy person has used the powers to the fullest to improve society to the maximum of their abilities. Yet, I argue they have the power to do so, therefore they have the moral responsibility to do so. The fact that they don’t makes me comfortable judging them to be evil.
- dmos62 1y agoWhat if a billionaire is unskilled in using their money to their full advantage to help people? Or what if the billionaire is ignorant? Would that make him evil? It sounds to me like you're equating them being inconvenient administrators of power to them being evil.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 1y agoThen it is a grave failure of our system that such a person should be the sole beneficiary of such massive wealth. I think in the same vane that 'ignorance of the law is not a defense", that being really bad of using vast power can be viewed as indistinguishable from evil.
- dmos62 1y agoThat's a valid viewpoint. Ignorance and all other vices ellicit compassion in me, though I don't have infinite patience by any stretch of imagination, so I have a discrepancy between principle and practice, I guess.
- palmfacehn 1y agoI won't engage with all of your comment here. I do appreciate your illustration of the form I was speaking of above. I will observe that empathy for the poor tends to look and sound quite different from demonizations of the rich.
- RhysU 1y agoYou've invented the plot device in Asimov's short story "Little Lost Robot" [1]. One robot has a modified first law which removes its obligation to avoid human harm through inaction. Fantastic story. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Lost_Robot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Lost_Robot