3 ms·

> the main barriers are legal and regulatory concerns rather than the tech they have failed in sfo, phoenix and other cities that rolled red carpet for them

roenxi 1y ago
Pretty solid evidence that self driving cars already exist though.
- pydry 1y ago
  I remember one reason phoenix was chosen as a trial location coz it was supposed to be one of the easiest places to drive. It's pretty damning that it failed there.
  - jkestner 1y ago
    Yeah, it’s a big grid with wide streets. Did it fail there? If so I imagine it’s just due to lack of business—there are almost no taxis in Phoenix. Mostly just from the airport.
- laserlight 1y ago
  When people say “we'll have self-driving cars next year”, I understand that self-driving cars will be widespread in the developed world and accessible to those who pay a premium. Given the status quo, I find it pointless to discuss the semantics of whether they exist or not.
  - godelski 1y ago
    Especially considering it would be weird to say "we'll have <something> next year" when we've technically had it for decades. And more specifically, I'm referencing Elon where the context is that its going to be a software push into Teslas that people already own
- godelski 1y ago
  As prototypes, yes. But that's like pointing to Japanese robots in the 80's and expecting robot butlers any day now. Or maybe Boston dynamics 10 years ago. Or when OpenAI was into robotics. There's a big gap between seeing something work in the lab and being ready for real world use. I know we do this in software, but that's a very abnormal thing (and honestly, maybe not the best)
  - xnx 1y ago
    Waymo is doing 250k paid rides/week.
- antonvs 1y ago
  You're confusing "exist" with "viable". When someone talks about "having" self-driving cars next year, they're not talking about what are essentially pilot programs.
  - roenxi 1y ago
    I don't think that is a reasonable generalisation. A lot of people would have been talking about the first person to take a real trip in a car that drives itself. A record that is in the past. Not to mention that HN gets really tetchy about achieving specifically SAE Level 6 when in practice some pretty basic driver assist tools are probably closer to what people meant. It reminds me of a gentlemen I ran into who was convinced that the OpenAI DoTA bot with a >99% win rate couldn't really be said to be playing the game. If someone can take their hands off the wheel for 10 minutes we're there in a common language sense; the human in the car isn't actively in control.
  - FabHK 1y ago
    Good point. On the "exist" interpretation, we've "had" flying cars for several decades.

roenxi 1y ago

Pretty solid evidence that self driving cars already exist though.

pydry 1y ago
I remember one reason phoenix was chosen as a trial location coz it was supposed to be one of the easiest places to drive. It's pretty damning that it failed there.
- jkestner 1y ago
  Yeah, it’s a big grid with wide streets. Did it fail there? If so I imagine it’s just due to lack of business—there are almost no taxis in Phoenix. Mostly just from the airport.
laserlight 1y ago
When people say “we'll have self-driving cars next year”, I understand that self-driving cars will be widespread in the developed world and accessible to those who pay a premium. Given the status quo, I find it pointless to discuss the semantics of whether they exist or not.
- godelski 1y ago
  Especially considering it would be weird to say "we'll have <something> next year" when we've technically had it for decades. And more specifically, I'm referencing Elon where the context is that its going to be a software push into Teslas that people already own
godelski 1y ago
As prototypes, yes. But that's like pointing to Japanese robots in the 80's and expecting robot butlers any day now. Or maybe Boston dynamics 10 years ago. Or when OpenAI was into robotics. There's a big gap between seeing something work in the lab and being ready for real world use. I know we do this in software, but that's a very abnormal thing (and honestly, maybe not the best)
- xnx 1y ago
  Waymo is doing 250k paid rides/week.
antonvs 1y ago
You're confusing "exist" with "viable". When someone talks about "having" self-driving cars next year, they're not talking about what are essentially pilot programs.
- roenxi 1y ago
  I don't think that is a reasonable generalisation. A lot of people would have been talking about the first person to take a real trip in a car that drives itself. A record that is in the past. Not to mention that HN gets really tetchy about achieving specifically SAE Level 6 when in practice some pretty basic driver assist tools are probably closer to what people meant. It reminds me of a gentlemen I ran into who was convinced that the OpenAI DoTA bot with a >99% win rate couldn't really be said to be playing the game. If someone can take their hands off the wheel for 10 minutes we're there in a common language sense; the human in the car isn't actively in control.
- FabHK 1y ago
  Good point. On the "exist" interpretation, we've "had" flying cars for several decades.