3 ms·
> You should know that LLMs are very weak in procedural operations. Indeed! That's why they are LLMs, not AI! Why are new hypes always re-defining terms? 20 y
by yusina 1y ago
> You should know that LLMs are very weak in procedural operations.
Indeed! That's why they are LLMs, not AI!
Why are new hypes always re-defining terms? 20 years ago, "AI" was actually about intelligence. Just like "crypto" was about cryptography instead of money scams.
> The phenomenon is part of all the "obvious" things that are not in the awareness of very large masses.
I can't imagine a single HN reader who is not aware that LLMs make mistakes. This is not the general public. (And even most of the general public has heard about this minor issue by now.)
- mdp2021 1y ago> terms[!] ... ... I can't imagine a single HN reader who is not aware that LLMs make mistakes. This is not the general public So you wrote 'article' but you meant "submission" ;) > And even most of the general public has heard about this minor issue by now And still some public or private enterprises are trying to push LLMs in dangerous parts of the workflow - possibly because drives like "cutting costs" or "chasing waves" are valued more than objective results... > "AI" was actually about intelligence It was (is) about providing outputs intelligently - relevantly.
- yusina 1y ago> So you wrote 'article' but you meant "submission" ;) Ah, true. Sorry.