3 ms·

> If anyone feels entitled over other people's sexual choices, I don’t see how this article is suggesting that. > we really don't care about people who refuse

> If anyone feels entitled over other people's sexual choices, I don’t see how this article is suggesting that. > we really don't care about people who refuse to get help and are holding hostile and harmful Blackpills aren’t hostile or harmful. By the way, if a phenomenon is large enough not to be called off as an individual’s quirk, I think society SHOULD care. Something is possibly wrong. And this has large impact on society itself.

notepad0x90 1y ago
> Blackpills aren’t hostile or harmful. If their reasoning boils down to "society owes me something, but since I can't get what I am owed, I will do ______" then I disagree. > By the way, if a phenomenon is large enough not to be called off as an individual’s quirk, I think society SHOULD care. Something is possibly wrong. And this has large impact on society itself. Something is always serious wrong with society, because it comprises of humans. 100 years ago 60%+ of humans in this same society couldn't vote or open up bank accounts. Marital rape was legal. Women's role in society changed because of advancements in medicine , transportation and technology in general. These guys don't want to accept that reality. And I agree with what you said, it is a problem, society shouldn't care about them or this problem, no more than it should with other criminally inclined groups. Gangs are a problem, no one is saying we should care about gangsters, law abiding citizens agree hostility against gangs is a good things. that's how I suggest they be treated. To be clear, I have no hostility against being celibate. the problem is when they add "involuntary" to it, as if they are being coerced. Our default setting is celibate, you have to work to change that condition. Imagine saying I'm "Involuntary non-billionaire" or something like that. That term suggest an implied entitlement, that's why they should be treated with hostility. Plenty of people live their entire lives celibate with devolving into this state.

notepad0x90 1y ago

> Blackpills aren’t hostile or harmful. If their reasoning boils down to "society owes me something, but since I can't get what I am owed, I will do ______" then I disagree. > By the way, if a phenomenon is large enough not to be called off as an individual’s quirk, I think society SHOULD care. Something is possibly wrong. And this has large impact on society itself. Something is always serious wrong with society, because it comprises of humans. 100 years ago 60%+ of humans in this same society couldn't vote or open up bank accounts. Marital rape was legal. Women's role in society changed because of advancements in medicine , transportation and technology in general. These guys don't want to accept that reality. And I agree with what you said, it is a problem, society shouldn't care about them or this problem, no more than it should with other criminally inclined groups. Gangs are a problem, no one is saying we should care about gangsters, law abiding citizens agree hostility against gangs is a good things. that's how I suggest they be treated. To be clear, I have no hostility against being celibate. the problem is when they add "involuntary" to it, as if they are being coerced. Our default setting is celibate, you have to work to change that condition. Imagine saying I'm "Involuntary non-billionaire" or something like that. That term suggest an implied entitlement, that's why they should be treated with hostility. Plenty of people live their entire lives celibate with devolving into this state.