>but that the rate of expansion itself is increasing over time. Take for example galaxies running from us at "c". They happen to be exactly at 13.7B light year

>but that the rate of expansion itself is increasing over time. Take for example galaxies running from us at "c". They happen to be exactly at 13.7B light years - coincidence? I don't think it is a coincidence, and some simple logic leads to conclusion that the same galaxies will be running from us at the same "c" say 300M years later - ie. then it will be "c" at 14B light years distance from us - which means that the Hubble constant is actually decreasing.