3 ms·
I disagree, it is worth talking about because the impacts of delegated decisions made impact real people in meaningful ways while those may or may not be chall
by SlightlyLeftPad 1y ago
I disagree, it is worth talking about because the impacts of delegated decisions made impact real people in meaningful ways while those may or may not be challenged in court. To say a branch can’t delegate absolute authority is also a mischaracterization of reality. Assuming orders are challenged in the first place, it often drags on for many months or years leaving the impacts in effect until that concludes.
- tptacek 1y agoIt's a classic example of an argument that proves too much. It might be correct, but it's not useful.