> I don't know how someone can legitimately say that they're useless. Clearly, statistical models trained on this HN thread would output that sequence of token

> I don't know how someone can legitimately say that they're useless. Clearly, statistical models trained on this HN thread would output that sequence of tokens with high probability. Are you suggesting that a statement being probable in a text corpus is not a legitimate source of truth? Can you generalize that a little bit?