4 ms·
Well, first of all, I don't buy the idea that there is a clear line between 'filter' and 'generative' AI. Even in the example Krita dev posted [0], you can see
by raincole 1y ago
Well, first of all, I don't buy the idea that there is a clear line between 'filter' and 'generative' AI. Even in the example Krita dev posted [0], you can see the 'filter' AI made up a bit detail (the way the girl's eyes look became different), it's just not as smart as so-called generative AI.
And about the privacy and copyright concern, what we currently have are:
Stable Diffusion: local and offline, but not copyright-clean.
Adobe Firefly: online, but copyright-clean (if we believe Adobe's claim).
So if we combine the better sides of both, it suddenly becomes okay?
[0]: https://krita-artists.org/uploads/default/original/3X/1/4/1427f148ad15f5525b42c233680cb9217fadb350.jpeg https://krita-artists.org/uploads/default/original/3X/1/4/14...
- spookie 1y agoWell, there is a clear line between a handmade filter and AI. But this is clearly AI since it relies on a filter optimized via automated training on images. I think we are in agreement, I have used more descriptive wording to just clearly indicate what I consider as a filter. (Edit: yeah, looking at the image I can see it clearly takes some artistic liberties. Even on the dragon.)