2 ms·
All quite beside the point. A military action, even a colonial invasion, to "pacify" a place and to take control of it has little to do with a full annexation.
by mytailorisrich 1y ago
All quite beside the point.
A military action, even a colonial invasion, to "pacify" a place and to take control of it has little to do with a full annexation. The US did not make Afghanistan a State... And even among European colonial empires Algeria is quite unique.
France had lost most of its Empire during the Revolution and Napoleonic period so was keen to rebuild one. France did not have a settled Canada or Australia, either, so perhaps this also played a role but it seems unrealistic to believe that trying that with an Arabic Muslim country could have ever worked.
- natmaka 1y ago> "pacify" a place and to take control of it has little to do with a full annexation Indeed. No objective is intangible. Actions taken to reduce an aggressive enemy to inaction can lead to a promising discovery (in this case, that of what would become Algeria, which was then a rich agricultural and pleasant territory occupied by non-unified tribes) leading to a desire to seize it.
- ashoeafoot 1y agoWhy do you have the deciding vote on whose narrative is right, wrong and what is final?