4 ms·
It works untill someone takes a screenshoot of the image
by Iulioh 1y ago
It works untill someone takes a screenshoot of the image
- A_D_E_P_T 1y agoThe watermark would still be there. You can take a photograph of the image with an old Polaroid and, if the resolution is high enough, the watermark would still be there.
- brookst 1y agoIf it can be detected, it can be removed. Asking that false things carry claims of falseness is a dead end.
- A_D_E_P_T 1y agoLet's say you want to release a deepfake image. Your AI image, as generated, is not watermarked or hashed. Difficulty: Story-mode. You can release your image in two minutes flat. Let's now let's say your AI deepfake image is watermarked/hashed upon generation. Difficulty: Intermediate to hard. You might be able to get it done, but not without real effort, and removing all traces of the watermark without leaving artefacts might be so difficult as to be nearly impossible. ...So it doesn't eliminate the possibility of fakes, but it hugely raises the cost and effort bar. Only the most motivated would bother.
- brookst 1y agoGood thing the detection and removal can’t be automated and zero effort, eh?
- A_D_E_P_T 1y agoCan that be done today, in a "zero effort" manner, even with watermarked stock images? I tried some "AI watermark removers" on a Shutterstock image, and they did a pretty good job, but they left traces that would be obvious to any investigator.
- airstrike 1y agoIf an image has no watermark, we could distrust it outright The problem then is repeated compressing causing that to occur inadvertently