> that’s not the story that the article was telling. It is though? Reading the article, I'm fully getting a sense that its point is that it was an improvement

> that’s not the story that the article was telling. It is though? Reading the article, I'm fully getting a sense that its point is that it was an improvement for everyone (despite the article describing it as being triggered from nagging from the women). Now you can choose not to believe that, but that _is_ the story the article was telling, or at least it's how I understand it.