3 ms·

So the spirit is right but the substance is BS? That's the architecture of everything populist. That's how you take on the elites, there's no case where the gen

by mrtksn 1y ago

So the spirit is right but the substance is BS? That's the architecture of everything populist. That's how you take on the elites, there's no case where the general population knows it better than the elites. It's a case of which elites went greedy or simply screwed up and people are unhappy with the current state of affairs. After all, is it not true that the people should take batter care of their health? I've seen people blaming it on AI but IMHO that's not the culprit. Populists always had the "best" grasp of the problems and the simplest solutions that will "solve everything" since ever. Now they can have those AI generated but before AI they had anecdotal evidence, obscure work of someone that no one else can reproduce or some historical fact that everybody knows but its complete fabrication or misrepresentation.

j_w 1y ago
How can the spirit be correct if the evidence backing the claims are non-existent? We are talking about a guy who says American's are losing their faith in the establishment and science, yet does so using a paper with fabricated references. This is at best hypocrisy and negligence and at worst just more lies from the administration.
- mrtksn 1y ago
  The the evidence on causes is wrong or non-existent. That doesn’t mean that there’s no evidence that Americans should get healthier because there’s plenty of evidence on that, like shorter lifespans or prevalence of health issues that are much less of a problem in other countries. In other words You should get healthier even if chemtrails don’t cause it.
  - j_w 1y ago
    The issue is that if you have a claim like "American's should get healthier" I would presume that you would have evidence that they are unhealthy in the first place (Note: I am not disputing this). If the evidence you supply for your claim is fabricated, then either your claim is bullshit or you are the wrong person for the job. RFK Jr. just often hits the first target and is always hitting the second.

by mrtksn 1y ago

j_w 1y ago

How can the spirit be correct if the evidence backing the claims are non-existent? We are talking about a guy who says American's are losing their faith in the establishment and science, yet does so using a paper with fabricated references. This is at best hypocrisy and negligence and at worst just more lies from the administration.

mrtksn 1y ago
The the evidence on causes is wrong or non-existent. That doesn’t mean that there’s no evidence that Americans should get healthier because there’s plenty of evidence on that, like shorter lifespans or prevalence of health issues that are much less of a problem in other countries. In other words You should get healthier even if chemtrails don’t cause it.
- j_w 1y ago
  The issue is that if you have a claim like "American's should get healthier" I would presume that you would have evidence that they are unhealthy in the first place (Note: I am not disputing this). If the evidence you supply for your claim is fabricated, then either your claim is bullshit or you are the wrong person for the job. RFK Jr. just often hits the first target and is always hitting the second.