4 ms·
Yes. I selectively pulled out the bits that I thought were relevant instead of quoting the whole thing. I know he said that it’s been good, but taken in relati
by JimDabell 1y ago
Yes. I selectively pulled out the bits that I thought were relevant instead of quoting the whole thing.
I know he said that it’s been good, but taken in relation to the rest of the article, I don’t place much weight on it.
The women persistently pressured the men to join, the men were apprehensive, they allowed them in for one morning, one morning turned into all the time, women now comprise 50% of the group, and the men’s area is now relegated to a back room they escape to.
They got one of the men to say it was good, but that’s not the story that the article was telling.
- williamdclt 1y ago> that’s not the story that the article was telling. It is though? Reading the article, I'm fully getting a sense that its point is that it was an improvement for everyone (despite the article describing it as being triggered from nagging from the women). Now you can choose not to believe that, but that _is_ the story the article was telling, or at least it's how I understand it.
- boppo1 1y ago[flagged]
- afavour 1y ago> the men were apprehensive, they allowed them in for one morning, one morning turned into all the time Your assumption is that it “turned into all the time” against the wishes of the men but that’s not clear at all. Being apprehensive about change and then quickly discovering it was for the better is something we all experience in life.