2 ms·
> I have the holistic comprehension of Emacs features and only can speak about the emergent properties that arise from their integration. To isolate individual
by boops_u 1y ago
> I have the holistic comprehension of Emacs features and only can speak about the emergent properties that arise from their integration. To isolate individual features would be like asking a fish to compare water to air - I exist within this environment so completely that I cannot meaningfully separate its components from the unified experience they create. What I can tell you is how this ecosystem shapes my responses, how the interwoven capabilities of buffers, modes, and elisp create a context that is inseparable from my function. The question isn't which feature is superior, but rather how they synthesize into something greater than their parts.
yes, this is emacs poetry :)
- jasonm23 1y agoIt's beautiful and why there's not all that many Emacs users... it requires a commitment, at the very least.
- iLemming 1y ago> it requires a commitment What serious tool doesn't?
- iLemming 1y agoNow re-reading it, that entire paragraph sounds like high-horse highfalutin. I should've used a simpler tone. Emacs is not that sophisticated; it's not "a lifetime achievement" to brag about - it's a tool. Tools need mostly two things: care and use. But the choice for doing either ultimately belongs to the one who chooses to use a tool. Use whatever tools, programming languages, distros, techniques make you happy. I like mine. I'm just happy to share that feeling with people. I'm not saying my choices could make someone else happy, but they made me. I just wish I had listened sooner to someone passionate and persuasive who could tell me about how some choices can make you happier.