3 ms·
I realize I'm talking about C++ not C, but coincidentally just today I ported our 7 year old library's Swig/Python interface to nanobind. What a fragile c9k Swi
by hughw 1y ago
I realize I'm talking about C++ not C, but coincidentally just today I ported our 7 year old library's Swig/Python interface to nanobind. What a fragile c9k Swig has been all these years (don't touch it!) and the nanobind transformation is so refreshing and clean, and lots of type information suddenly available to Python programs. One day of effort and our tests all pass, and now nanobind seems able to allow us to improve the ergonomics (from the Python pov) of our lib.
- rrdharan 1y agoWhat is c9k short for?
- spacechild1 1y agoI guess it's "clusterfuck" :)
- DonHopkins 1y agoA c9k problem is much worse than a y2k problem (yuck).