4 ms·
Because it seems fairly obvious you can use a standard `for` if you need more control over the iteration.
by dgellow 1y ago
Because it seems fairly obvious you can use a standard `for` if you need more control over the iteration.
- Rochus 1y agoThe argument is still reasonable. The OP didn't claim that there is no "for" loop, but that the "foreach" is a high-level construct which is not intuitively comprehensible and thus doesn't fit to the C3 language design.