2 ms·
What a stupid thing to say. If he's bored the teacher can advance his grade faster or at least give him personally more challenging material. Should we never t
by jxjnskkzxxhx 1y ago
What a stupid thing to say. If he's bored the teacher can advance his grade faster or at least give him personally more challenging material.
Should we never teach anyone anything, just to avoid they'll be bored when they see something they already know? Is starting to learn at 6 objectively "better" than at 2? No, that's just how our system currently works. And what you're saying is you want your kid to be mediocre. Great, but the rest of us are aiming higher.
- programjames 1y agoAnd, in most places, your public school has the legal obligation to provide an education for all ability levels, including people who show up to their first year with the ability to read. Even in the United States of America, where the culture is only the bottom 20% of students deserve to learn, most school districts still have this in their bylaws (they just ignore it).
- sincerecook 1y agoYes, we should never teach anyone anything because someone raised a mild and relevant objection.