3 ms·
I can actually see this bein' one task that current levels of language models would excel at, honestly... Given the limited list of items on a typical fast-foo
by blooalien 1y ago
I can actually see this bein' one task that current levels of language models would excel at, honestly... Given the limited list of items on a typical fast-food menu, and the accuracy of even some of the lowliest modern language models and speech recognition, I see no reason why fast-food order-taking needs to be handled by humans at all anymore, especially if you confirm the final order with the human ordering before proceeding; I could honestly see that bein' much more accurate than a human doing that job. (I can't count how many times over the years I've had a human order-taker completely screw the order up despite them repeating the order back exactly as given. A well-designed LLM-based system likely shouldn't have that problem. What it repeats back should end up bein' exactly the order that the system pushes through to completion.)
- jqpabc123 1y agowould excel at, honestly. You would think so --- but well financed tests in the real world suggest otherwise.
- DrillShopper 1y agoTypical AI fanatic behavior - presented with the evidence that it doesn't work and goes "hmm, this should work perfectly!" If that doesn't sum up AI hype and apologia then I don't know what does.
- blooalien 1y agoYeah, no. I'm not an "AI fanatic" by a long-shot, but whatever... I use A.I. sometimes, and other times I don't. When I do use it, I use it for what it's good at. When I don't, it's because it's simply not capable of the task at hand. Simple as that. :shrug: