4 ms·

Thanks, that wants me to use AI even less. Both examples has nothing to do with an open and free internet. Meaning I cannot trust AI at all. All those examples

Thanks, that wants me to use AI even less. Both examples has nothing to do with an open and free internet. Meaning I cannot trust AI at all. All those examples of data source here, also in the other replies, using mainly highly biased sources. Wikipedia (biased by a small group of mods), YouTube filtered by Google itself, pasting customer travel advice email heavily violates GDPR, social forums also funneled. If we loose organic sites, we loose freedom. Fair enough, organic sites does mean the information there is correct, but still it is open and free, so organic sites can be treated as Gaussian distributed.

jasode 1y ago
>, pasting customer travel advice email heavily violates GDPR Not seeing how pasting text with no personal identity information would violate GDPR. E.g. someone sends an email saying "For your career prospects, I think you should learn Rust instead of COBOL." Copy&pasting that into AI or an AI scanning that sentence with no identity information isn't going to violate GDPR. There's no personal data to violate. (If the AI companies deliberately want to ignore privacy laws and want to secretly attach personal data to that "Rust/COBOL" sentence, then yes, that violates GDPR.) EDIT reply to : >or the AI autoscans the customer's email inbox That auto-scan scenario still doesn't require the AI to save the personal identifiers attached to text fragments. Many ways to do that without violating GDPR. Consider how today's global spam filters "auto scan" customers' incoming emails to automatically categorize some of them for the customers' "Junk folder" without any intervention or violation of GDPR.
- Aldipower 1y ago
  > or the AI autoscans the customer's email inbox