3 ms·
> bluesky uniquely hates AI. very toxic around it. Not unique at all; AI hate to the point of viewing it as literally the destruction of civilization warrantin
by dragonwriter 1y ago
> bluesky uniquely hates AI. very toxic around it.
Not unique at all; AI hate to the point of viewing it as literally the destruction of civilization warranting being stopped by any means is extremely common on Twitter.
If there's anything unique about Bluesky’s anti-AI culture is that the opposite extreme of AI grifters hasn't moved to Bluesky in numbers that provide the balance of nuttiness that Twitter provides.
- swyx 1y agoyou can block grifters. easy. nothing you can do about absence of and harrassment of high signal AI people. which eugene is. that is bluesky's unique problem so far.
- dragonwriter 1y agoYes, if you are relying on social media as an AI information source, the absence of “high signal AI people” on a platform is a problem, though its a distinct problem from “AI hate” on the platform.
- Karrot_Kream 1y agoDo you think LLM powered labellers can help?
- sebstefan 1y ago>Not unique at all; AI hate to the point of viewing it as literally the destruction of civilization warranting being stopped by any means is extremely common on Twitter Well maybe because it's not at all being addressed by the other side Things that are never addressed by AI grifters: * The effect it's going to have on the sources of data it's driving traffic away from? * What happens to the adoption curve when Stack overflow is dead and LLMs don't have a strong base of knowledge on it? * Unlike the sewing machine, this one is primarily automating the tasks people enjoy? * Climate change impact? It's like wailing that the discourse around proof of work cryptos isn't up to snuff, but you don't care about the environmental impacts yourself. Well, then your discourse is not up to standard either.