4 ms·
Evidence that they would perform just as well as kids from “good homes” if they had good homes?
by ryan93 1y ago
Evidence that they would perform just as well as kids from “good homes” if they had good homes?
- triceratops 1y agoThe kids from good homes perform better.
- watwut 1y agoHuh, it is pretty much settled that kids from "good homes" have better school results then the ones from "bad homes". The kids themselves are under less stres, they eat better, they sleep more, they have someone who cares about their school results. The parents have more resources (time, ability, inclination) to intervene when things go badly regardless of what school does.
- bsder 1y agoThe Gates Foundation documented that underperforming students tend to actually gain on the average throughout the school year. The problem is that those same students lose terribly over the summer break. Students from better socioeconomic strata gain over the summer break while those of lower socioeconomic strata do not. Thus, when the school year begins again, any gains made over the school year have been more than cancelled out over the summer. This is one of the big arguments for year-round school.
- em-bee 1y agohow does that work? they forget everything they learned in the past year if they don't go to school for two months? i can understand setbacks, increase of behavioral issues, but completely cancelling out?
- bsder 1y agoOver 3 months it's easy to forget something that you probably only had a tenuous grasp on. My father was a high school teacher and loathed Christmas break. "I spend 4 months pouring information in, and it's gone in 4 days." In addition, higher socioeconomic status children keep making progress during the summer.