2 ms·
all they did was move the resonance problem with there fuel lines somewhere else.......and it should be noted that there top shelf guy who was doing resonance m
by metalman 1y ago
all they did was move the resonance problem with there fuel lines somewhere else.......and it should be noted that there top shelf guy who was doing resonance mitigating design and engineering, left the company last year, quietly, all smiles and handshakes.
resonance is test bench defying, in that real world issues only show up when there is no dampening effects from iether bieng bolted to a test stand or even just sitting on the ground under the influence of gravity, so figuring it out on the ground requires, math, mojo, and experience.Lots of counterintuive gotcha's as well.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> top shelf guy who was doing resonance mitigating design and engineering, left the company last year Who?
- metalman 1y agofrom northern europe somewhere, also did work for major auto makers, may be working from home, may have left with his team, from memory of a skim read last year only remember because I like Resonance and TV engineering, similar but different interesting phenominion and continues to be challenging. The one thing they have going for them on the starship program, is data.....the thing going against them is that they are making 600 changes to each iteration......which is actualy ok, as when they solve for the issues, they should end up with a wide configuration envelope for the ship.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> from northern europe somewhere, also did work for major auto makers, may be working from home, may have left with his team This doesn't sound like it describes anyone in ITAR-regulated work.
- metalman 1y agothe ringers generaly dont fit any description's ,right 19 year old getting paid to play with the fed's computers right at this moment
- JumpCrisscross 1y agoLet me be blunter: it doesn't sound credible absent a name.
- metalman 1y agoI hestitate, but ok, blunter then,Mr,umm, Mr ummmm, hmmmmmmm , ANYWAY, the only other datum I retain is that the informatiin was contained in a regular published article (from the internet), and not a blog or forum, and was not a "hype" piece, just strait across the plate journalism if I had the spit, and the time I would wade through trying out various search terms, but I cant quite face the internet trying to sell me whatever wild missinterpretation of "space x resonce engineering chief retires"(2024)......I am betting they run with "retires", but refuse to look