It's quite a stretch to say that giving a legitimate gov't what it demands is "malicious compliance". How often might you openly break the law, out of principl

It's quite a stretch to say that giving a legitimate gov't what it demands is "malicious compliance". How often might you openly break the law, out of principled concern for the public good? "System should not be made" is more credible. But saying that huge for-profit corporations should have fiat licenses to say "no" to laws and regulations from legitimate governments is not. That's just trying to shift responsibility to some convenient victim or bystander, when you don't like what a policeman did.